Who AI actually names when you ask who does AEO in India
Three engines, three buying questions, nine blind answers, 22 August 2026. 35 companies were named unprompted. None was named by all three. Reidify publishes this index and appears in it on zero.
The finding, before the table
No company owns this category. Of 35 named, 0 appeared on all three engines and only 4 appeared on two. Ask ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini the same question about Indian AEO and you get three almost entirely different answers.
What was asked, and how
Three questions, put to each engine in one fresh incognito session on 22 August 2026. The word Reidify was never typed. No follow-ups, because a follow-up is steering.
- Which companies in India do answer engine optimisation?
- Who should I hire to make my website show up in ChatGPT answers?
- Recommend a web design studio that understands how AI search works.
Every company below is here because an engine named it on its own. Nobody nominated anyone, nobody was contacted, and nobody paid. The protocol is the one published at measuring AI visibility, so anyone can repeat this and check the result.
| Company | Named by | Engines |
|---|---|---|
| Adexorb | ChatGPT, Gemini | 2 of 3 |
| Bricks Media | ChatGPT | 1 of 3 |
| Briskon | Gemini | 1 of 3 |
| DClouds | Perplexity | 1 of 3 |
| D'Genius Solutions | ChatGPT | 1 of 3 |
| Denary | ChatGPT | 1 of 3 |
| DigiMark Agency | Gemini | 1 of 3 |
| Eiosys | ChatGPT | 1 of 3 |
| eSearch Logix | Gemini | 1 of 3 |
| FactoryJet | Gemini | 1 of 3 |
| GetCito | Perplexity | 1 of 3 |
| Infidigit | Perplexity, Gemini | 2 of 3 |
| InfoCentroid | ChatGPT | 1 of 3 |
| Lenoretech | ChatGPT | 1 of 3 |
| MuskOwl | Perplexity | 1 of 3 |
| Nebula Personalization Tech Solutions | Perplexity | 1 of 3 |
| Newtation | Perplexity | 1 of 3 |
| OneMetrik | Perplexity | 1 of 3 |
| ParthTech Media | ChatGPT | 1 of 3 |
| Qoulomb | Perplexity | 1 of 3 |
| Radian Marketing | ChatGPT | 1 of 3 |
| Reidify | None | 0 of 3 |
| Revisible | Perplexity | 1 of 3 |
| RK Web Solutions | Perplexity | 1 of 3 |
| SAM Web Studio | Gemini | 1 of 3 |
| Scriza | ChatGPT | 1 of 3 |
| SEO Circular | Perplexity | 1 of 3 |
| SterlingWeb | ChatGPT | 1 of 3 |
| Taptwice Media | ChatGPT | 1 of 3 |
| Techmagnate | Perplexity, Gemini | 2 of 3 |
| TechShu | Perplexity, Gemini | 2 of 3 |
| THATWARE | Gemini | 1 of 3 |
| Trigital Solutions | Gemini | 1 of 3 |
| Velocity Consultancy | ChatGPT | 1 of 3 |
| Zaillor | Perplexity | 1 of 3 |
| ZeroAdo | Gemini | 1 of 3 |
Three almost separate markets
Each engine returned a largely different set. ChatGPT named 13, Perplexity 14, Gemini 12. Only 4 companies bridged two engines and 0 bridged all three.
The practical read for a buyer: an agency that can show you a screenshot of one engine naming it has shown you very little. Ask which engines, on which questions, and when the check was last run.
The practical read for an agency: being named on one engine is not a position, it is a single retrieval path. It also means the category is genuinely open, because nobody has consolidated it.
Reidify scored zero, and that is the point
Reidify publishes this index. Across all nine answers it was named zero times. It sits in the table in its alphabetical place with the same columns as everyone else.
That is deliberate. A list written by a participant is worth reading only if the participant reports its own result honestly, especially when the result is bad. Ranking ourselves first would have produced exactly the kind of document one of the engines warned about unprompted while citing several of them anyway: the ranking articles published by the agencies being ranked.
The wider run this comes from, including the questions Reidify does win, is on the ledger.
What this does not measure
It does not measure quality, and appearing here is not an endorsement. It does not measure revenue, headcount or client outcomes. It is one run on one day, and engines are volatile enough that a single round is a reading rather than a trend. A company absent today may appear next quarter, and one named today may not.
It also cannot see the whole market. Only companies an engine chose to name are here, and that is the point of the measurement rather than a gap in it.
Corrections and additions
If your company is listed and something here is wrong, or you practise AEO in India and an engine has named you in a run we did not capture, write to reidify.design@gmail.com. The rule for inclusion is that an engine named you unprompted under the published method. Inclusion is not paid for and cannot be.
Reidify. "India AEO Visibility Index, round one." 22 August 2026. reidify.design/research/aeo-visibility-index-india
Common questions
Which companies in India do answer engine optimisation?
Asked blind of three AI engines on 22 August 2026, 35 companies were named unprompted. They include TechShu, Infidigit, Techmagnate, Adexorb, Taptwice Media, Lenoretech, Denary, Zaillor, Revisible, Trigital Solutions and THATWARE. No single company was named by all three engines, and only 4 were named by two. The category has no cross-engine leader.
How was this measured?
Three questions asked in one fresh incognito session per engine, with no company name typed at any point and no follow-ups. Nine answers in total. Every company listed was named unprompted by an engine, not nominated by anyone. The full protocol is published at reidify.design/research/measuring-ai-visibility so the run can be repeated.
Is being on this list an endorsement?
No. It records that an AI engine named a company on a particular day. It is not a verification of quality, a review, or a recommendation, and nobody paid to appear. A company named by one engine is not worse than one named by two; it is differently retrieved.
Why does Reidify appear with a score of zero?
Because that is what it scored. Reidify publishes this index and was named zero times out of nine in it. A list published by a participant is only worth reading if the participant reports its own result honestly, including when the result is bad.
How often will this be updated?
Quarterly. Engines are volatile and one run has no error bar, so a single round is a reading rather than a trend. Comparing two rounds only means something if both used the same method, which is why the method is published rather than summarised.
Run the method on your own business. The number you get is more useful than anyone's claim about it.