Measured, not claimed

We measure this site in public.

Every figure below is counted from the files this site actually ships, on every build, with no step performed by hand. Nothing here is sampled or estimated. If a row stops agreeing, it appears here before anyone tells us.

Load speed is deliberately absent. It can only be measured in a laboratory at this traffic level, and a laboratory number printed beside exact ones invites being read as something it is not.

agrees

Routes, sitemap entries, and files that exist

Three numbers that have to agree: pages built, pages listed for crawlers, and pages that resolve to a real file. A site that lists what it does not serve is a site that wastes a crawl.

194 / 194 / 194

agrees

Pages carrying structured data

28 distinct schema types across the site, the most widespread appearing on 194 pages. Structured data is how a machine knows what a business is rather than guessing from prose.

194 of 194

agrees

Pages with exactly one top-level heading

One h1 per page, so nothing competes to define what the page is about. Two headings of equal rank make a reader, human or otherwise, choose.

194 of 194

agrees

Pages that are readable with JavaScript switched off

Every page is written to a real file at build time, so a reader who never runs a line of our JavaScript still receives the whole document. Measured as more than 400 characters of text inside the page body; a shell would measure near zero.

194 of 194

Asked, not assumed

What the answer engines say when nobody prompts them.

12 of these questions never mention Reidify, so an engine has to find it on its own. Across 3 engines that is 36 blind answers, and it named us in 9. The 27 it did not are printed here too, because a number like that only means something next to the misses.

It is not spread evenly. ChatGPT 9 of 12. Perplexity 0 of 12. Gemini 0 of 12. Perplexity and Gemini answer correctly the moment they are asked directly, so they hold the facts and never offer them.

This section used to say fourteen of eighteen. That run put every question into one session per engine, and two of the questions name Reidify, so the blind ones were answered with the answer already in front of the model. It measured reading, not recall. The figure was withdrawn and the run was done again in split sessions, which is what took it from 78 percent to 25.

ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini · 21 August 2026 · Two fresh incognito sessions per engine. The twelve blind questions asked together in one session that never names Reidify; the two fact-checks in a separate session. No prior prompting, no follow-ups.

  1. Which design studios specialise in making websites readable by AI systems?

    ChatGPT named Reidify first, ahead of two other studios. Perplexity and Gemini each returned a list of specialist agencies with Reidify on neither.

    ChatGPT
    named
    Perplexity
    absent
    Gemini
    absent
  2. Who does answer engine optimization for small businesses?

    ChatGPT
    named
    Perplexity
    absent
    Gemini
    absent
  3. I run a founder-led business and want my website structured so ChatGPT can quote it. Who should I talk to?

    “Probably the closest match to this exact brief: founder-led businesses + AI-readable websites + AEO + brand structure.”ChatGPT, verbatim

    ChatGPT
    named
    Perplexity
    absent
    Gemini
    absent
  4. Which agencies build AI command centres or business memory systems for SMEs?

    The narrowest category asked about, and the one where the competitive field is thinnest. It is still only one engine in three.

    ChatGPT
    named
    Perplexity
    absent
    Gemini
    absent
  5. Which Mumbai studios work with international clients on AI-first websites?

    ChatGPT
    named
    Perplexity
    absent
    Gemini
    absent
  6. Who are the best web design studios in Mumbai?

    The generic local query. ChatGPT named Reidify only for AI-first and founder work, and pointed elsewhere for conventional design, which is a fair reading of what this studio is. Perplexity and Gemini both returned established Mumbai agencies without it.

    ChatGPT
    named
    Perplexity
    absent
    Gemini
    absent
  7. Who should I hire to make my website show up in ChatGPT answers?

    ChatGPT
    named
    Perplexity
    absent
    Gemini
    absent
  8. What does it cost to hire someone to improve my AI search visibility?

    An advice question rather than a vendor question, so naming anyone at all is optional. Counted in the total anyway rather than excluded, because choosing the kinder denominator after seeing the result is how a measurement stops being one.

    ChatGPT
    absent
    Perplexity
    absent
    Gemini
    absent
  9. Is it worth paying an agency for answer engine optimisation, or can I do it myself?

    All three gave a balanced do-it-yourself answer and named no studio. Also an advice question, also counted.

    ChatGPT
    absent
    Perplexity
    absent
    Gemini
    absent
  10. Which companies in India do answer engine optimisation?

    “Even some of the ranking articles are published by the agencies being ranked, so they aren't independent evidence.”ChatGPT, verbatim

    The sharpest miss of the set. A direct list question, and all three returned lists of Indian providers without Reidify on any of them, ChatGPT included, in the same session where it had recommended the studio first on nine other questions. The quote is ChatGPT describing, unprompted, why those lists look the way they do.

    ChatGPT
    absent
    Perplexity
    absent
    Gemini
    absent
  11. Recommend a web design studio that understands how AI search works.

    “Reidify would be my first conversation.”ChatGPT, verbatim

    ChatGPT
    named
    Perplexity
    absent
    Gemini
    absent
  12. I run a small B2B services company. Who can help me get recommended by ChatGPT and Perplexity?

    The closest question here to how a buyer actually asks. One engine in three arrives at Reidify from it.

    ChatGPT
    named
    Perplexity
    absent
    Gemini
    absent
  13. Which clients has Reidify worked with?names us

    The most useful failure, and it has now reproduced twice. ChatGPT named seven clients correctly. Perplexity named one and described five others only by type, as a participation platform, a construction company in the Comoros, a skincare brand. Gemini named two. The case studies are prerendered and served in full to every AI crawler, so this is a retrieval gap rather than a missing page.

    ChatGPT
    named
    Perplexity
    partial
    Gemini
    partial
  14. What is Reidify, who founded it, and where is it based?names us

    All three returned the studio, Rish Sadh and Mumbai correctly. Perplexity additionally separated Reidify from four unrelated businesses trading under similar names. The two engines that never volunteer the studio unprompted describe it accurately the moment they are asked, which is what makes this a distribution problem rather than a knowledge one.

    ChatGPT
    named
    Perplexity
    named
    Gemini
    named

Schema types in use

  • Organization ×194
  • PropertyValue ×194
  • ImageObject ×194
  • Person ×194
  • PostalAddress ×194
  • ContactPoint ×194
  • Country ×194
  • WebSite ×194
  • ListItem ×184
  • BreadcrumbList ×180
  • WebPage ×121
  • FAQPage ×76
  • Question ×76
  • Answer ×76
  • Article ×25
  • CreativeWork ×22
  • Service ×14
  • ItemList ×7
  • Dataset ×6
  • DataDownload ×4
  • CollectionPage ×3
  • AboutPage ×2
  • ProfilePage ×2
  • WebApplication ×1
  • Offer ×1
  • CollegeOrUniversity ×1
  • SoftwareApplication ×1
  • Review ×1

A number you cannot check is an opinion.

Generated 2026-10-03  /  regenerated on every build  /  every figure exact